Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 2576600, member: 8215"] This all sounds spot on, and it's what I would have argued, except for the fact that, if I can put 2 and 2 together, the contract itself is not legally binding until the NRL registers it. As has been said above, that makes it virtually toilet paper. Yes, both parties have signed it, but it would be written somewhere that it's still not binding until the NRL registers it. The counter-argument would be of course that if its written on it, then surely you can add a clause that excludes it. The counter-counter argument may be that the NRL will refuse to register any contract that has any amendments or exclusions to these clauses that were added due to the latest CBA. It's a whole bunch of legal crap that unless one of us can secure a copy of a genuine contract, is all speculation. Just as someone who belongs to a union-controlled industry, the employer and employee can both sign any contract they want, but due to the legal legislation in the industry, it too is useless if it does not adhere to the proper conditions that their industry must comply with. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 258 (members: 0, guests: 258)