Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Foordy, post: 2818366, member: 1769"] we'll have to agree to disagree, because I don't believe that rule exists given what i could find about it from the NRL website (even the article about the change from round 13 rule to 10 day cooling off period mentioned anything about there also being a new anti tampering deadline of November 1) and what some of the others working in the industry (like 1910 have stated on here) There was an anti tampering deadline of November 1 once they abolished the old June 30 deadline... but they got rid of that as well (as said in the article i posted) because they simply didn't work. clubs weren't even trying to hide the fact they were talking to and signing players before Nov 1. they abolished November 1 and brought in the round 13 rule (which also allowed players to talk to and sign with any club they wanted, but the contract wouldn't be official until round 13 of their final year), but abolished that after the DCE fiasco to bring in a simple 10 day cooling off period. Not that i think we should sign either of those players officially while they are under contract (unless we can get something concrete from their current clubs (as well as themselves obviously) stating that they are prepared to release said player. lets just agree to disagree :superhappythumbsup: [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 16 (members: 0, guests: 16)