Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Mr Fourex, post: 2441079, member: 7980"] That's right !! and who should be??? Peter Wallace should be ...that's who!! It's the same old Wallace when Locky was still playing. In the games when Lockyer was injured or had origin duties, the young guys needed someone to lead them around the park. That was Wallaces job he failed miserably then and he's failing miserably now. Coxy nailed it when he said "He's a very average, solid player without anything spectacular.". That's all Wallace is and that's all Peter Wallace will ever be and to beads (and I'm sure porthoz is lurking out there too) the only bias/agenda I have is that Brisbane won't succeed with Peter Wallace as our half. That's it. Fullstop! I haven't once said ditch him altogether. Last year when McC was not looking like he was going to make it I wanted to put Wallace at 9. I still think he's a better 9 than he is a halfback (although his passing game of late has gone to shit as well. I've lost count of how many of his passes either miss the mark or dribble hopelessly along the ground). Unfortunately for Wallace, McC can play good footy and is becoming more consistent in his approach to the game. Wallace could still be good value coming off the bench......he has a very good defensive game and could provide good relief for either Hunt or McC when need be. It's at least worth a try FFS.......what we have now is getting worse. Not better. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 9 (members: 0, guests: 9)