Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Panthers v Dogs spoiler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2189838, member: 1764"] It will definitely come into play. Particularly the part of the appeal judgement that said: "The NRL erred in stating in the original case that the reason for 2 points being deducted was due to the impact of the breach." or words to that effect. Basically the appeals judge said there is NO excuse for 14 players EVER, but because the NRL misled the Broncos into thinking there was, they had to give the points back and give them a whopping great fine instead. But they were very adamant, all future breaches should result in a 2 point deduction. And therein lies the issue IMO. If the Dogs had lost, the NRL would've just issued them a fine. It should be all or nothing. Either you lose 2 points REGARDLESS of the result, or you get a fine. I think it has to be black and white. There's no excuse for it. At all. What the penalty should be? Dunno. But I'd be pissed if I was a bulldogs fan, same way I was pissed when the Broncos had their points taken in 04. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Panthers v Dogs spoiler
Top