Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2498441, member: 1899"] Earlier, I told a fellow poster that they could have summed up their argument in two words. In here, you can basically sum up this article with 3 'We got dis'. It's a PR puff piece and a waste of time for any of us fans to read. What I'm saying here is, don't take any of his words seriously. The article did raise an approach I don't agree with and that's our vulture recruitment policy. If that's honestly true, it's one of the laziest recruitment methods I've seen. We're going to wait until some high profile stuffs up or a club fluffs their cheque book? C'marn! I know that nearly nabbed us GI and TheDugan but jiminy christ if Nolan wasn't keen on signing Norman on $450K I'd almost want him back over Gee. This idea that we can sustain ourselves entirely on our 20s/ISC affiliates is silly on a couple of fronts. 1. They haven't been that good. Ever since Hook stopped coaching them they haven't made the 8 and the only debutants to make first grade for us in that time have been Jordan Kahu, Lachlan Maranta and Aaron Whitchurch. 2. We don't put up that big a fight to keep them. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 180 (members: 0, guests: 180)