Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2570422, member: 1899"] Chambers is a strange ol' player. I like to describe him as flakey. On his day, capable of some good plays and is all-round pretty solid but there are times where he'll just drop the pill cold, or position himself in no-man's land offering the opposition easy gaps or just come up with complete brain farts altogether. I don't think anybody had him in that league of Slater, GI, Hayne etc. He was just one of those names you use to pad up a list either to make another guy look bad (these guys are all better than him! Even Chambers!) or to show off that you watch an extra game or two than the average folk and your opinion means more than a paid professional. Back to Alec's point and I agree. I'd rather have Tate > Chambers in the centres and as such I'd go Lee > Chambers on the wing because I don't believe Chambers will be able to make that transition as well. Lee has that potential and upside. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 21 (members: 0, guests: 21)