Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CaptainHook, post: 2640729, member: 8315"] Good points, Port. I think the main difference with Lockyer though is that his individual performances, with very rare exceptions, were of a high standard during those years you mentioned. He was remarkably consistent in teams that were struggling as well as being hampered with injury as he was in 2010. As I said with a few exceptions, Locky's best games were a 9 and his worst, in my opinion, were about a 7. That's consistency and it should be the bare minimum for a captain - namely having your own game in order. Again, imo, Macca's best games have been a 9 and his worst have been about a 3-4. Just my opinion but far too inconsistent to be captaincy material. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)