Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2405147, member: 1899"] Hence why I went with to a lesser extent. I just couldn't look pass his talent and think when fit, he's a very good backrow who's got more improvement in him and I feel as if he won't cost us the bank to keep. Wallace on the other hand, probably will as we're paying him to stay away from his family and really, what you see is what you get. Don't get me wrong, I've been content with his contributions but I feel as if we've got the halves to cover for him. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 313 (members: 0, guests: 313)