Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Player Movements / Rumours 2011/2012
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Ari Gold, post: 2435762, member: 1917"] As I agree the Sharks and Roosters are dead weight I'm going to jump in on this one. I think the Titans are dead weight too. But not the Storm. Cronulla and "Sydney" are not important markets. They aren't big markets, and there are lots of other teams in close proximity. Long term, will the existence of the Sharks and Roosters help lay a foundation for league to grow significantly in those areas? IMO, no. Does the existence of the Storm help grow the presence in a key market? Absolutely. Granted I don't think it's very fast and spectacular progress, but having a presence and growing the game in a region like Melbourne has benefits. So even though they don't pull big crowds, their existence is still purposeful. Is the existence of the Sharks and the Roosters going to provide the same sort of potential benefits? Not at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Player Movements / Rumours 2011/2012
Top