Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Donny, post: 2322365, member: 2241"] Agree 100% If the Video ref doesnt give a penalty the player has to be interchanged and it cost the team a interchange, two because if its a important player like your 6 or 7 because you want them back on so another to get them back on. Another idea is if the video ref looks at the incident after somebody stays down (dives) and the video ref see's nothing in it, a penalty could be awarded to the defending team. The NRL changed the Video ref rule end of last year. The only way the video ref can award a penalty is if the incident is bad enough to place on report. The incident with Farah was a disgrace. There is no way in this world Matai should of been put on report, but the video ref wanted to give a penalty so he had to place it on report. WHY DID THE NRL EVEN BOTHER TO CHANGE THE RULE IF THE VIDEO REF IS GOING TO PUT PEOPLE ON REPORT FOR INCIDENTS OF THAT NATURE JUST SO HE CAN AWARD A PENALTY??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Another thing to come out of the whole FARAH dive incident. If Farah was so injured why wasnt he interchanged?? They had the free interchange after MATAI was placed on report? Why wasnt he? Because he wasnt injured thats why!!!!! TBH its hurting the game. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 37 (members: 0, guests: 37)