Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3184961, member: 1992"] Too stupid not to stupid. A comma every now and then would be helpful and capitals to start sentences when required. Most of the posters aren't too stupid to understand my point of view but what they're doing is ranting about views I don't hold. They're taking straight forward statements and rewording them and in doing so fundamentally changing what was adequately expressed previously. That's stupid. I stated their was no evidence (from the teams onfield performance, ladder position, stats) that the recovery course provided any gain. It's a pretty straightforward position. Quite a few respondents completely changed that, presented it as my view and then attacked me on that basis. Childlike reasoning. For the record. Peds are not guaranteed to provide a benefit, I'm pretty sure no drug is. Another thing, the Dank regime was also not a guaranteed result and certainly didn't have a tick of approval from the medical/science community. In short, no one knows or knew in advance that it would produce the anticipated gain. On the face of it it doesn't appear that Cronulla or Essendon gained from the regime. There isn't any need to change what I've written. I've expressed my view. Rearranging my words, adding stuff and making illogical leaps is not honestly representing my views. The following from theshed is an example: well if it does come back positive, according @[IMG alt="Huge"]https://broncoshq.com/data/avatars/s/1/1992.jpg?1597921246[/IMG]Huge science, we’ll have to wait and see where the Eels finish this year to determine if Jennings actually cheated or just took PEDs. This is what I mean and it's not a position I hold. This thread is littered with such examples. It's stupid. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 128 (members: 0, guests: 128)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now