Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3185746, member: 1992"] You've decided you know why Snowden hit a 'purple patch' as you call it DESPITE the fact the supposed purple patch started a FULL YEAR before the 6 week ped course. Anybody looking on would have to say that's irrational as it's blatantly obvious that Snowden was playing tremendous football long before the ped course. I frankly am stunned that you're still clinging to your presupposition when the evidence (his selection in country origin and the SOO in 2010) straight out destroys the presupposition. I just don't see how you can keep it up, it's plainly wrong. Strange how none of the others(on the ped course) hit a purple patch isn't it? I'm hardly surprised by Snowdens front row partner having a good run in 2011 as it quite often happens when your offsider is smashing it. Quick ptbs quite often come when your prime mover is going gangbusters and elevating team mates is also often a consequence. However, if you have decided you know why something is happening (and despite the evidence) you just cannot see a more rational reason or entertain a more plausible explanation for good form. For you Morkel, they must have gained some benefit even though their team mates didn't suddenly become worldbeaters from the same programme. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)