Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Rhys van Beurden, post: 2659458, member: 8317"] I got bored and worked out each team from round 1's total run amount, their total metres gained, and their average metres gained per run, based from NRL Live Stats. Brisbane 949m/115 runs= 8.25m per run Souths 1394m/162 runs= 8.6m per run Parramatta 1163m/133 runs= 8.74m per run Manly 987m/141 runs= 7m per run Newcastle 1523m/169 runs= 9.01m per run NZ 1513m/180 runs= 8.41m per run Gold Coast 1258m/152 runs= 8.28m per run Wests 1277m/154 runs= 8.29m per run NQ 1386m/164 runs= 8.45m per run Sydney 1296m/140 runs= 9.26m per run Penrith 1317m/154 runs= 8.55m per run Canterbury 1391m/180 runs= 7.73m per run Cronulla 1362m/152 runs= 8.96m per run Canberra 1220m/147 runs= 8.29m per run St. George 1481m/181 runs= 8.18m per run Melbourne 1333m/145 runs= 9.19m per run This is telling of a few things. First, Broncos made fourth least metres per run of any team, and the least of any team in total. Secondly, we made the least amount of runs by 18. That is a huge amount, and just goes to show how little ball we had. Canterbury's much vaunted forward pack made very little impact, where a team like Melbourne, with whom has a relatively weak forward pack in my opinion, made a lot of ground. Both St. George and Manly, who's forward packs are known to be weak, lived up to their name by making very little ground. Anyway, I just felt like sharing that because I was bored. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 27 (members: 0, guests: 27)