Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="QUEENSLANDER, post: 2708644, member: 1771"] Lockyer was the best player i had ever seen play the game. Until JT came along. All this talk of "he hasnt lead his team to many premierships" is rubbish. One man doesnt make a team. One man cant carry a team to a title. Lockyer was the best at chiming in when he needed to. He was the best clutch player too, probably will always be the best. But to me, he didnt control games as much as JT can. He was more the player that let his halves partner look after the majority of the game, and he would chime in when he saw fit. Absoutely nothing wrong with this, but to me, JT has more pressure on him as the player controlling the game. His record speaks for itself. He hasnt missed an origin game in 11 years, and of those years we have won 9 series. It's no coincidence. The guy is a freak, and I absolutely believe he is the best player I have ever seen. No doubt in my mind whatsoever. Both players leave Johns for dead imo. Johns had a few dominant years, but he couldnt even lock down the blues halfback jersey. Whether or not JT is inducted into the immortals before locky or not is not something I care about. I think both of them should be eventually. I dont think JT is overrated however, and all of the people saying the cowboys win was set up by the NRL so they could get their fairytale is just being a bad loser. The broncos did not play well enough to win that game. They shouldnt have been trying to hold a 4 point lead for nearly half of the game. Horrible tactics. The cowboys worked their asses off for that win and totally deserve it. No-one should be trying to take any gloss off that. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 329 (members: 0, guests: 329)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now