Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Foordy, post: 3329267, member: 1769"] Here is information from the Dean Ritchie article that inspired this thread. I was concerned by the bit in red, I'm not sure the NRL have any interest of moving away from the East Coast of Australia and NZ despite their name including the word "national" WA bid boss, Laurie Puddy, the inaugural Reds chairman, has met ARLC chairman Peter V’landys about [URL='https://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl-expansion-peter-vlandys-says-dolphins-will-be-test-case-as-magic-number-of-18-comes-into-view/news-story/4abf2bb0a2cd2a27f3a294fb8ad89493']Perth becoming the NRL’s 18th franchise[/URL]. [B]Laurie Puddy on why Perth?[/B] “The only thing that has changed since the Western Reds is the desire from the NRL to say: ‘Let’s do Perth again’. I can’t understand why the hierarchy doesn’t see it,” he said. “It would make it a national competition and the two-hour time change makes sense for broadcasters. “Souths go over there on a regular basis. Manly, Canterbury. They know the crowds they can pull – 20,000-plus. They get 5000 to 10,000 more people at Perth than they would do at a home game. “Back in 1995, the population of WA was about 1.3 million. The population of Perth today is nearly three million. “We had 24,000 people at our first game (in 1995) and averaged around 15,400 thereafter, and that was playing at the WACA, which is a cricket ground. “I have business contacts and colleagues sitting in Perth waiting for something to happen. All they say is: “Laurie, when is it going to happen?’ Support for the game isn’t in question. Why wouldn’t Perth be a success? We have done it before. “Some experts are talking about playing in places like PNG. That’s offensive. “If we couldn’t get 20,000 a game then I’m a bad judge. Back in 1994-95, we were inundated with support from sponsors. [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]“I have had a meeting with Peter (V’landys). There was nothing to come of it,[/COLOR] although we agreed to meet again. That hasn’t transpired yet with Covid and, of course, he has had his hands full. I respect that. “What we have to do first is get in front of Peter again and Andrew (Abdo, NRL CEO) and have a serious discussion about Western Australia.” [B]Laurie Puddy on admission date?[/B] “It would take us two years,” he said. “It took us two years last time and it would take us two years again. You’d want (entry) in 2024. “I would drive it (the bid) but you might find there are other people in Perth who would want to have a crack too. The answer is we need to get a team into Perth. “I’ve talked to the WA Government and they would open their arms to us and help in any way to get us back and get us a ground. They would talk to us about how we could develop our own high performance centre. “I was at the (2018) State of Origin in Perth, there were 60,000 people there. And you know the thing that amazed me? “The amount of people walking into the ground wearing Western Reds gear. It was amazing. That should tell the hierarchy that there is a demand for rugby league at that level in Perth. “Why would you want to change (the Reds name)? Why come up with another name when the people in Perth still relate to the Reds?” Pressed on whether a club could be ready and accepted by 2024, Puddy said: “Absolutely, absolutely.” [B]Laurie Puddy on past history?[/B] “We have to clear up some misconceptions – the Western Reds didn’t fail,” Puddy said. “People have been quick to say the Reds failed. The Reds were caught up in a war between News Ltd and the ARL. We need to clear up the history. “Some of the critics are of the belief that Perth failed. They didn’t fail at all. “We had to pay not only for our teams to travel, feed them and accommodation, but we also had to pay for the teams coming to Perth. We flew all the teams in – paid for everything — and we still didn’t go broke. “We had a viable business. The first year we were one game out of the eight. “We built a team in two years and brought them in from everywhere – England, New Zealand, Europe. It wasn’t a five-minute exercise. “We were happy with the way it was going and it was going to be a success story. John Ribot was in control of the Storm at that stage and he took about five or six of our best players to Melbourne. We were doing very well until the war came along.” [B]Laurie Puddy on AFL Tidal wave when told league would struggle for fans and sponsorship dollars?[/B] “That’s rubbish,” he said. “The fans follow their AFL sides but when you look at the population in Perth, and see where they come from, there is a desire for rugby league — and we have to give it to them. “Why do we have success when we go and play State of Origin in Perth? Or Souths games? They don’t take the fans with them. They happen to be there. “As I said to Peter V’landys, in 1995-96, we had the third-biggest selling merchandise in the whole bloody competition. “It (junior participation) isn’t as good as it could be. We had development officers going around to all the schools and we could do that again. In fact, it’s already been suggested we should start that again next year. The colleges still play rugby union in Perth. “I really can’t see too much of a downside.” [B]Mark Geyer says:[/B] “I’m biased but it’s a no-brainer,” Geyer said. “If you want it to be a truly National Rugby League then we have to be national. “We can’t just be up the eastern seaboard. Now is the time to strike. Let’s delve into this. I think it would be mega if they did it, it would be awesome. “They’ve got (businessman) ‘Twiggy’ Forrest over there. He loves his sport. They need a code over there other than AFL. I have had thousands of messages from people from Perth saying: ‘C’mon, think about us’. “The difference in time is good as well for television, that’s a big tick so let’s go to Perth. It’s time to go back, it’s the Reds baby, let’s go. I dare say if Super League didn’t come along then we’d still be there.” [B]NRL Response from Andrew Abdo[/B] “In the long-term, if there was further expansion, the ARLC would consider all options – from Western Australia to New Zealand and the Pacific,” Abdo said. “There are so many opportunities. Why would you want to exclude anywhere? “We’ve also indicated to both the Firehawks and the Jets that the ARLC remains open to reconsidering their bids in the future. “Our focus for now is making sure we have a successful move to 17 teams in 2023, across all aspects, football, commercial and participation. The consideration of a move to 18 teams would be a strategic long-term one for the ARLC in the future. “Right now our priority is ensuring the successful expansion of the NRLW to six teams and the NRL to 17 teams.” [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now