Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WASSHHH, post: 3202072, member: 9424"] No need for your last paragraph - I’m not one to sit on an Internet forum and get upset because someone writes some unflattering words about me 👍 And I certainly appreciate you taking the time to respond and the length you went to, but I see no benefit to be gained by you, me or anyone else bothering to read this back-and-forth in me attempting to respond to each point. Please don’t take that as patronising or condescending either, it is not in any way supposed to be. Nor is it meant to imply that I couldn’t care to do so. Reality is though, I am unable to control how you perceive me and the posts that I make. Some you might agree with, others I am certain you won’t. I learnt some time ago that people will base their perception of others on what they see and the filter they apply to it. We all do it. So whilst I may not necessarily agree with what you observe about me, there are no words I can type that will change your mind. One thing I will say though is that I thought I had qualified that I do have an agenda against both Milford and Boyd, based solely around my high expectations of them. I also don’t believe, hand on heart, that I was condescending or that I necessarily criticised you for seemingly having an agenda against Boyd, rather I observed the similarities in my posts about Milford as yours about Boyd. Perhaps where I went wrong was to assume that you, like others on here, were trying to discredit others comments by implying they have an agenda and using it as an easy-out. Almost as a trump-card (not to be mistaken with the orange variety) if you will. However, your response here demonstrates that you’ve considered what you said and why you said it. But as is always the case, I am on my phone, so typing long posts is annoying and trying to refer to long posts / posts on previous pages even more so. So maybe I’ve got it all wrong, it certainly wouldn’t be the first time. That said; agenda or not, and my perceived ability / inability to accept praise for Milford aside, I honestly just cannot agree that his kicking in 2020, as a whole, was anything better than average. To be clear, I am not arguing with you. Nor am I trying to make you agree with me. But to provide you the same courtesy you did me, and as I said in my follow up post to my own post (because only the greatest posters of all time quote themselves!!), if Milford demonstrated a strong, solid kicking game in 2020, we wouldn’t have to search for and cherry-pick the performances where this occurred. Rather, we would be able to very easily find the instances where it wasn't the case. Unfortunately, I just don’t believe that is the case. For someone who wasn’t going to write a long post, I failed miserably. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 68 (members: 0, guests: 68)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now