Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Fitzy, post: 3474323, member: 9881"] Yeah but show me a club who can take 2 injuries and not struggle that isn’t otherwise already shit. That’s the true measurement of depth at the end of the day. How does your depth stack up against other teams and it does pretty well. There’s a lot of teams whose second drop I wouldn’t give a contract let alone a run. Like people were saying Panthers before but they only have 2 depth outside backs and one of them is yet to debut, it’s a good system so he’d do fine but you chuck them two at any other club and they would be in struggle street as well. Like I’d say Penrith, Us, Roosters and Cows have the best back lines by a donkeys dick. The only 2 players that any of those 3 clubs have that wouldn’t hurt your side is Momorovski and Turuva. I’d say none of our players are quite at either of those levels but I’d be playing Mariner, Hoeter, Arthars and Pereira long before any other depth option between them. You chuck in Eels and Sharks with decent back lines I’d argue Sharks probably are in the top few teams in terms of long term back up options with Ikavalu and Tracey as for the Eels who have a pretty good starting backline there depth can barely last 80 minutes in a season let alone 20 games. Storm have awful depth, Rabbitohs depth isn’t very good, Raiders is decent, Dragons is not bad either, Knights is decent, Dogs is average, Warriors is decent, Titans is alright lack numbers though, Sea Eagles is average, Dolphins have decent depth but there starting side is predominantly of depth quality, Tigers starters are shit depth players let alone there actual depth and I think you get the picture. We have a premiership quality backline in my opinion and I don’t think you can do much better than Pereira, Arthars, Mariner and Hoeter to back it up. 2 players with 40 games who would be the long termers, Hoeter proved to be reliable every game last year and Mariner is a young talented player who can genuinely emulate our starters performances from time to time. If you don’t rate that in the upper echolant of depth in the comp than really no point continuing to argue cause it’s clear we will never be aligned on this matter [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now