Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 2784017, member: 8272"] How would he not be considered successful? I haven't once mentioned the word successful- I specially said I am not talking about ability just that 20 Tests is not experienced. So you pick the best batsman ever who played 20 years of Test cricket. You have to view things in context. He played in an era where you played 52 Tests and that was your career- he had to work during the day, He also had a war in the middle of his Test career which took six years. It also took 6 months to get anywhere and he played against the countries he could play against- West Indies, England, South Africa and India. I have only been talking about experience and again he played Test cricket for 20 years. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)