Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="whykickamoocow, post: 3557269, member: 8447"] Answer to original question. Walsh he’s not far off Hunt at same age but has so much more potential. Walsh is Slater and Locker’s love child. It’s scary how good he can become. As for the best fullback debate etc Slater was brilliant and had the best career as a fullback I’ve seen. But his best game wasn’t better than Lockyer’s best in the #1. I hate the Slater changed the way fullbacks play blah blah blah because of his ball playing. Slater changed his game because Hunt was keeping him out of rep teams because of his superior ball playing. More importantly Lockyer had already won 3 premierships as a ball playing fullback & switched to 5/8 before anyone had even heard of Slater. If I had my choice at signing any of those 4 at 21 to be my long term fullback my priority would be Locky. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)