Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ari Gold, post: 2420688, member: 1917"] I don't really know what type of KPIs you set for a referee. It's not like a job where you have to reach certain quotas or anything. As for the Reed sin-binning, I applaud the action, but strongly disagree with the call. For mine, Reed let go and Reynolds just milked it by falling forward. Reed, IMO, wasn't holding down un-necessarily and it shouldn't have been a penalty. With that said though, in that particular instance, if you think it is a penalty, IMO, you should send the offender to the sin bin as well. So I agree with the decision to send the offender to the bin, I just disagree there was an infringement to begin with. Personally, I think a better option is to explore a longer advantage like they do in Rugby Union. Let Souths have an attacking set after the Reynolds play the ball so it is not as simple to just concede a penalty and only concede the 2 instead of 6. Likewise, if Beale doesn't score after the Hunt regather, bring the penalty back for the late hit on Wallace. It'll stop teams conceding penalties to limit the damage to 2, and it will stop the ridiculous number of penalty goal attempts that we see these days. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 32 (members: 0, guests: 32)