Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rnabokov, post: 3173970, member: 1847"] I understand Seibold is not interested in defamation. He wants criminal proceedings brought against those he alleges cyber-bullied him and therefore went to the police. Accordingly, the NRL has shelved their investigations because police are conducting theirs. In any case, whether it's defamation or a criminal matter, when you say "you have to go to a court and prove they did. They don’t have to do jack sh*t.", isn't that the case anyway at trial, where the prosecution has to prove its case on the facts? And the defence's job is just that, defend the accusations, which isn't jacksh*t. Seibold's task - an admittedly very difficult one - is to produce the hard evidence hence the police, whose job it is to investigate, whether they laugh at it (probably Roosters supporters) or not. And if they laugh at Seibold's case and "then move on to actual criminal investigations", then that says a lot about the NSW Police. Since Seibold isn't looking at defamation, the issue of damages doesn't arise. There is no hip pocket wanting to be filled. As he is seeking criminal proceedings and not defamation, then of course he is paying for it. And good on him. He's been bullied and he wants justice. I hope he gets it. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)