Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Professor47, post: 2531552, member: 1831"] Personally, I'm not the biggest fat on Sticky BUT: 1) Roosters - Even when you have a good team, it is still hard to win a comp, not to mention make the GF. As many experts in the game have said before --> so many things have to go 'right' in the year. They won 02, made 03 and 04. He did some good here, there is no doubt about that. 2) Sharks - 50-50. From the outside in as a footy fan, from all media reports when the Sharks were going good - all was well and he formed some good relationships at his time here. Hard to judge the coaching once it all went downhill because the Sharks were a basket case then (still are tbh). 3) Eels - really? I mean... of course he could have done a bit better but honestly apart from that 'HAYNE TRAIN' 09... this club has been in trouble for a long, long time. Everyone knows it. 7 coaches in 7 years or thereabouts right? Still had massive problems administration wise before then as well. It doesn't look good on the resume but I wouldn't look too much into the Eels tbh. So basically 2 basket case clubs and 1 'top-tier' club. I think Sticky is a little bit over-rated but I think he still has more to show. Let's see what happens at Canberra... which is also a club who has had their dramas though... [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 15 (members: 0, guests: 15)