Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2638007, member: 1899"] OK. Others may rubbish the thought but I consider it interesting food for thought. Here is my issue with your justification. I disagree with the implication that games played is a reflection of development. Both players were afforded similar opportunities and both are at similar stages not only at their career but also in life. The difference is that McCullough was able to keep his spot where as Waddell found himself out of work at not one but two different clubs. Let's be honest too, neither of those clubs could really be choosers when it came to the dummy half position, yet they didn't think Waddell was good enough. I don't mind the notion of changing things up at dummy half but I disagree with the justification there. In my view, Waddell would have to improve a lot just to reach McCullough's level, let alone surpass him. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 21 (members: 0, guests: 21)