Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Live Game Chat
Round 10 Discussion (Magic Round)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="BroncsFan, post: 3264897, member: 9052"] The Papalii one being a perfect example of what they're trying to rule out of the game. His aim is the top of the ball with his shoulder, which is fine, but if you miss your mark you're going to be slapped down hard... and I think that is fair enough. I think Sua's was similar and some others over the weekend. If your shoulder comes in contact with their head (excluding whiplash) then you should expect to be sitting down for 10mins. I have massive issues with Burr's being a sin bin though. Fine with it being a penalty, but shouldn't be on report and absolutely should not have been a sin bin. Under the new rules I think the only ones the ref should put on report are the ones they intend to sin bin or send off. The Munster free interchange shenanigans means anything on report is a free interchange for the team's middle rotation. If they're going to lower the standard of what goes on report it completely shits in the face of trying to bring fatigue back into the game and it becomes a total lottery on free interchanges ie. another thing for the ref to apply inconsistently, but will have a major bearing/ manipulation on the game. We had 4 players put on report that's effectively 4 free interchanges for the opposition... yet only one of the players put on report was serious enough that they're missing a week and even then Riki is only suspended because they ramped up the penalties on crushers. However if the foul play is deemed significant enough for a sin bin or send off then the other team should rightly get a free interchange as an added deterrent. The lessening of what constitutes a sin binning means the serious high shots and reportable offences are unlikely to be missed anyway. Under this kind of interpretation neither TPJ or Chad's tackles would be deemed significant enough to warrant going on report (as they didn't go to the bin) and therefore the game wouldnt have been stopped to charge and penalise either team. The MRC can pick up any missed tackles later on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Live Game Chat
Round 10 Discussion (Magic Round)
Top