Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Renegade, post: 3049511, member: 1928"] I'm arguing from the perspective that let's give Seibold till the end of 2021 to prove he's the right man for the job. I think giving blanket guarantees means you're accepting failure, and that to me is unacceptable. I have no issues giving time to someone that can prove they are moving in the right direction. The facts at this stage speak for themselves though, no one has improved under his watch and our results have been disastrous. I'm not saying we should have kept WB, I was quite happy to give someone else a go, but let's not be ignorant to the idea that at the moment we look absolutely shithouse and that isn't indicative of a coach that knows what they're doing. Let's face it, if Seibold had been a premiership winning coach, or even a coach that had been around for 5+ years, there would be more leeway on him being given time to get it right as he would've presumably had runs on the board in the aforementioned scenario. The fact is, he doesn't. He was coach for one year, in a team that was already assembled for him and had already won a premiership ergo had a winning mentality. [automerge]1561943898[/automerge] The board should be held accountable too, but if the board goes hey Seibold is the man for the job, than obviously partial blame needs to go the coach too. It can't be none of his fault, and he needs to prove to himself, to the board, and to the fans, that he's the right choice. No one (reasonable) is deathriding him, but there is nothing wrong with having a healthy dose of skepticism on whether we made the right choice. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 80 (members: 0, guests: 80)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now