Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Round 16 - Broncos vs Raiders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Super Freak, post: 2955391, member: 8536"] It's not an opinionated guess, it's a well known rule that's been around for years. Have you ever seen moments where a player is trying to catch a kick or a pass and he gets whacked the moment he touches it and loses it and it's play on? That's because he is deemed to be playing at it, and you can tackle players playing at the ball. The same applies in this situation. Kodi is playing at the ball, he has touched it therefore Boyd has every right to do what he did. The scenario you suggested, if he bats it back and is tackled almost immediately then it's play on. If it's well after, it's a penalty. The contact has to be pretty much simultaneous. The tackled without possession rule is more about moments players are tackled on suspicion because the defender thinks they are getting the ball or chasers that are tackled while chasing a kick etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Round 16 - Broncos vs Raiders
Top