Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CowboysStampede, post: 3289286, member: 13322"] [st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][IMG]https://www.cowboysstampede.com.au/data/avatars/s/1/1133.jpg?1619313850[/IMG][/st_td_row][st_td][B][SIZE=5]Joshaz87[/SIZE][/B] - [SIZE=3]www.cowboysstampede.com.au[/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"][SIZE=2][B]JOINED: [/B].April 5, 2011 [B]MESSAGES:[/B] 19,026 [B]Reaction Score: 5,546[/B][/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table][HR][/HR] It goes on and on doesn't it. When they had Slater, at different times, they had Inglis then Widdop and then Munster as back-up fullbacks. Then Slater goes and they have Papanhauzen and Hynes. My understanding is Brandy was actually promised he'd get the spot sooner. So it would have been Grant that was either: A) made the same promise B) was convinced to wait until not only after Smith but also after Brandy. [HR][/HR][size=3]“I believe I’m the best six at this club. I’m just doing my best week-in week-out to play No.6. That’s where I want to play.” Scott 'Drinky' Drinkwater[/size] [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)