Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NZWarriors.com, post: 3291383, member: 13274"] [st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][IMG]https://cdn-1b8d.kxcdn.com/data/avatars/s/4/4775.jpg?1625130596[/IMG][/st_td_row][st_td][B][SIZE=5]wizards rage[/SIZE][/B] - [SIZE=3]nzwarriors.com[/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"][SIZE=2][B]JOINED: [/B].April 18, 2016 [B]MESSAGES:[/B] 3,704 [B]REACTIONS: 11,085[/B][/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table][HR][/HR] Great article with many good point but I think it misses some major ones. Players have to be lighter to handle the fatigue and it has changed to a fast game rather than a power game. By default it is more attacking with more points, just from lower player weight and increased acceleration. A team of explosive speedsters like the Storm will run rings around a traditional power based team. The power teams are dropping the weight but are still slow, while lacking the weight to hammer in defence or bust through in attack. You see players that were weapons becoming ineffective, while speed freaks like Walker and Walsh, who wouldn’t have seen first grade, are now able to thrive. It’s also a test of squads rather than best top 17s. The new faster rules and leaner players directly results in more injuries. The better squads are prospering over teams with everything invested in their top team. Even when all squads have been re-aligned to the rules, being attack based there will be a higher spread in scores. [HR][/HR][size=3]Smash em bro[/size] [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 257 (members: 0, guests: 257)