Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="McHunt, post: 3528292, member: 9853"] We don't have a poor history with the judiciary. That's pure fantasy, a tedious conspiracy theory that's not backed up by our record this year. That horse has been flogged to death. Walsh is defending the charge using Nick Ghabar. The club must think they have evidence to acquit him. That's the basis for me expecting him to get off. But if the ref testifies he thinks Walsh was talking to him, then he's gone. And none of us should have any objection to it. Well I certainly won't. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 106 (members: 0, guests: 106)