Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CaptainHook, post: 3053147, member: 8315"] Awesome discussion [USER=8387]@pagey[/USER] and [USER=9614]@Stu_9[/USER] Good points made by both of you. Would be interesting to see the look of the side if McCullough had not been injured. That being said, what happened happened though and Seibs can only play the hand he's dealt, and Turpin, to his credit, has remained in the team. Berrigan was a revelation at 9 back in the day - I can't remember that far back but no doubt injuries played a role in getting him in that position. I'm sure there are other examples regardless of whoever was coach. Have been thinking of Bennett and Seibold a little bit lately. So, Gorden Tallis made some very interesting comments in the wake of our victory over the Roosters. He said the Broncos reverted back to "Bennett-ball" and it worked. Whether that's true or not, I don't know but is it possible Seibold is over-coaching the players? Either way I'm now beginning to understand why words like 'horrific' are being tossed around about the Broncos. Just imagine if Seibold can do Bennett-ball better than Bennett...frightening. That is some Lovecraftian horror right there! We are at the foot of the Mountains of Madness. Let's never think of that again. The other thing was what if Bennett had stayed this year. I read a few times, here and there, that we might be in a slightly better position. For instance, we may have hung on against St George-Illawarra and the Wests Tigers. If that's the case, then Seibold deserves a wrap for tough, hard-fought wins over the Warriors and the Sharks. I mean, if we're going to give Bennett imaginary praise for hypothetical wins then surely we have to give Seibold real credit for actual victories against tough sides away from home. Fair's fair. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 266 (members: 0, guests: 266)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now