Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Battler, post: 2958892, member: 8509"] This sounds good in theory, especially if we were talking about a profession like construction, but in practice it doesn't work in high performance sport. If the club wants to get rid of a player it deems shit they're going to: being in the top 30 doesn't make a difference. Look at Oppa for example, the club has identified him as being a Qcup player and I suspect he'll never play for the Broncos again despite being in the top 30. I don't see why there can't be a provision for clubs to bring in juniors they've developed that are outside of the top 30. I mean, clubs like the rorters would rarely do it because they buy rosters, but if a club like the eels or raiders (picked out two clubs at random that actually produce juniors) wants to bring in someone that's playing well and they deem deserves a shot, then they shouldn't be denied just to give an average player who's a dead man walking career wise an extra few games of FG. The average bloke is still getting paid. TL;DR: if you're shit you're not going to play FG footy unless you're at a club like the titans or knights, being in the top 30 doesn't make a difference. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 82 (members: 0, guests: 82)