Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Thelmus, post: 3179009, member: 8988"] I'm not even sure of the point of this rule? Do they seriously think it matters who packs in when every contested scrum is reset, and the side only has to nominate backs instead of forwards for a business as usual scrum. Without scrums for kicks in touch, what does that leave? Knock ons. I think at times we deliberately try and make the game more complex when a much more simpler solution could do the same thing. Drop the numbers to twelve. Have stoppages for decisions limited to actual breaks in play and challenges, then watch the speed of the game increase. They are halfway there now with try bunker ajudications. They may as well go the whole hog. Another thing. Anytime a player holds up play make him leave the field for a medical assessment. There should be no staying on the field if the game is stopped for the player's well-being. I could go on about certain rules interpretations like "grounding with the midriff or a momentary contact being a try but this will end up longer than "war & peace". Any just my 2 cents. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)