Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Round 22 - Broncos vs Panthers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Thelmus, post: 3064069, member: 8988"] Yeah, I'm a bit perplexed by that one. It's a contact sport and if your not tackled and the player doesn't make contact with the head, how can it be right to penalise it? He landed on the player and the player was free to protect himself. Forceful contact with a player on the ground happens literally every game in most sets of 6. Usually the player is held which is worse but in that instance, he wasn't. Sure, he treated him like a rag doll, but you got to be able to make contact to tackle him. Surely if you do it forcefully would be a matter of conjecture in most cases. Now if we expect a player to not attack an untackled player, then likewise the onus must be on the player to get to both feet before passing. And why is a large player penalised for it but a smaller fullback, half or centre can slide in and hit a larger player whilst scoring? surely that too is forceful contact. This rule seems broken to me, despite its noble intention. It is too open to interpretation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Round 22 - Broncos vs Panthers
Top