Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kimlo, post: 3064588, member: 2021"] Honestly, I've enjoyed seeing Milf in the 1 jersey but with every passing game I'm starting to agree more with [USER=8290]@Unbreakable[/USER] that he does not have a future in the 1. Seriously, his run metres are borderline terrible. Let me list some stats below: [B]Milford[/B] [B]- Last 6 rounds[/B] RD 22: 10 runs 69m RD 21: 13 runs 77m RD 20: 11 runs 78m RD 19: 19 runs 203m RD 18: 9 runs 67m RD 17: 19 runs 219m [B]Average: [/B]13.5 runs for 118m [B]Boyd - Last 6 rounds[/B] RD 16: 17 runs 154m RD 13: 10 runs 78m RD 12: 7 runs 55m RD 11: 15 runs 107m RD 10: 7 runs 73m RD 9: 10 runs 73m [B]Average:[/B] 11 runs for 90m What is he really doing at fullback that Boyd wasn't doing? Saving the odd try? If that's his only benefit over Boyd then it's kind of pointless. The fullback needs to be a running threat to be an effective team. Not only that, by having him at fullback it's harder for him to be in position to be our first choice kicker. Milford has actually become one of the best kickers of the ball in the last year or two IMO, so we lose by FAR our best kicking option, gain not very much in attack but we might save the odd try in defence that Boyd isn't fast enough to get to. Is that worth it? We lose IMO, the best 5/8 in the game to get, IMO, a pretty fucking average, if not bottom tier fullback. Better than Boyd, sure, but not by much. Maybe his body just isn't right and he needs an off season to get in shape for it but I'm not convinced. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now