Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Live Game Chat
Round 24 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Dexter, post: 2524626, member: 1978"] If the refs or judiciary deem a hit to be deliberate then the damage caused is taken into account and in this instance they deemed the hit deliberate and aimed at the head and made contact and caused a broken jaw. If that is not a send off then what is? My personal view was it was a reflex to protect himself, I know if I was in that position that's exactly what I would have done to brace for impact. I agree if no damage had been done he wouldn't have been sent, but when the damage is so obvious and caused by an illegal tackle I can't see what option the refs had. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Live Game Chat
Round 24 Discussion
Top