Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Anonymous person, post: 2394289, member: 2115"] yeh i realise that, but from the 20+ replays i watched of it there was no doubt that he touched it while it was on the line. he didnt ever have control of it, not even remotely, but he touched it. but like i said, i cant hold that decision against them as it was a very tough one. also, im not 100% sure on the benefit of the doubt rule, but at the stage where they were questioning if gidley had touched it on the line or not, there was no Bronco touching it or anything - so im not sure if the benefit of the doubt rule applies. i would assume the benefit of the doubt only goes to the attacking team when the person is potentially scoring a try and theres doubt over if the ball gets grounded etc? i dont think the attacking team should get the benefit of the doubt for a defender grounding the ball when theres no attacker involved, and im not sure if the NRL agrees or not. anyone know? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 9 (members: 0, guests: 9)