Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WASSHHH, post: 2920723, member: 9424"] If we lose because of a penalty like that, I’d be dirty - so I can certainly understand the controversy over it. However, 2 things I noticed: - Johns, Fittler and co. after the game peacocking around about how they understand and can accept penalties for offside when on the try line but not elsewhere. Uhhm no. The same rules apply on every blade of grass on the ~ 7000m2 field. - Cleary after the game stating that historically penalties aren’t given in golden point and as such, that wasn’t a penalty. Whilst that might be the case, that pretty much says to me that you were going to push the boundaries without fear of reprieve for breaking the rules - guess that didn’t work out this time, did it. Otherwise, a draw was a more fitting result for what was a pretty ordinary game from both sides. But if I was to polish a turd; they did beat the Roosters and Storm back to back in a similar fashion, which makes our victory seem less unimpressive. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 173 (members: 0, guests: 173)