Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OXY-351, post: 2483260, member: 2107"] I noticed that too. I'm pretty sure the commentators made a comment on it too though. It was made in good spirits, but if they are going to take it to the letter of the law, it was deliberate contact with the ref. I don't think the rule should really exist for those type of touches, but the rule is the rule as it currently stands, and if they want to make it balck and white, then he should get charged. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)