Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3132843, member: 1992"] This is so weird. Emails? That's completely and totally unrelated to cheating. 50, 50000 or 50 million emails, none of it's relevant because that's just a process offence. It was only a 'crime' after the fact, it was a condition or punishment that was imposed AFTER a real offence. This rewriting/whitewashing of Bellamy's cheating involvement to somehow give the impression that Flanagan had greater guilt is repugnant and plainly stupid. Flanagan knew very well that his entire team was undergoing the Dank programme and he doesn't dispute that just the same as the Essenden coach did. Both men clearly didn't intend to cheat nor did they think what they were doing was illegal. Anyone who thinks more than 100 people from two codes all colluded to cheat and keep it a secret is fucked in the head. Melbourne however DID ATTEMPT/SUCCEED at cheating. In fact it was systemic and long lasting unlike the 6 week recovery drug programme that Dank sold the two clubs. Fucking emails, who fucking cares. The biggest cheat (in rugby league history) was Melbourne and Bellamy presided over it as Flanagan did with Cronulla. The difference between the offences is measured in light years. If Bellamy is okay to coach Brisbane then so is Flanagan, a vastly less guilty guy. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)