Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Foordy, post: 2482557, member: 1769"] Personally i don't have a problem with the charge itself ... its this BS loading system that is a joke. to add 20% to the charge because of a tackle that was made nearly 2 years ago is BS. IMO, the loading system should be something like: - if chargeable incidents are in different categories (i.e. touching ref and dangerous throw) = no loading - if player receives between x number of suspensions and y number of suspensions = 20% loading and the loading % increases with the more suspensions a player receives. - if a player keeps a clean record for 2 years loading system resets [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)