Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2600399, member: 1992"] Sandow should have been sent off altogether and suspended 2-4 matches. Referees decisions and mistakes should be a weekly segment where they admit to whatever wrongs they have made or explanations given as to why they reach a particular decisions.Poor decisions get a fine of sorts in the manner of wage reductions for the week. Referees believe they are sacrosanct and their word is law but even judges decisions can be overturned. Recently one on field ref clearly could be heard saying six again yet the other ref refused to accept it and incorrectly gave possession to the wrong team. I'm all for protecting refs but the inconsistency of the ten metres( a problem easily solved with technology ) is just one aspect of many. I want the right decisions made on field and don't give a shit about a slight delay. If the central ( TV monitor ref ) needs to make something right then he should do so. Time is something we have but a wrong decision can destroy a coaches career or ruin a teams season. Right is better than fast and wrong. I wasn't proud of Sandow even if he verbalised that which we know to be true. Bought referees and crooked judiciaries. NSW has for years received favourable decisions when SOO players from that state have faced sanction. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 42 (members: 0, guests: 42)