Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="m1c, post: 2404384, member: 1944"] He signed a long term, low money deal in order to help the club retain their list from the cheating years. In terms people here might understand it's similar to the Petero saga in that it allowed more senior players to have their pay day. Once they left the club failed to address the disparity of his actual value and his contract. It could have been as much as 300k p/a over 2 or 3 years. It's not uncommon, despite being under contract players are often upgraded. They tried to stand over him. It was a huge fail on the Bulldogs part. What club fails to re-negotiate their best players contract to something in line with his standing at the club and within the game? They ballsed up big time and painted him as the villain. SBW handled it poorly, however he was young and dumb. How would you react to a similar scenario? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)