Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 2786081, member: 8272"] See I thought he must be talking about State cricket because no one would say inconsistent after five test matches. Guess I was wrong there. One 100 and a 62 not out from your first five games, filling in all over the order and in two losses out of those five- is pretty good. More to cricket than reading Cricinfo. His first Test he was not out twice, and Australia only need 107 to win- they were 4/83 when he came in- not really much room to do much more than get a small score. The 0 and 27- Australia collapsed both times and got smashed by England. In the huge run chase he was one of our highest scorers with that 27. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)