Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3077019, member: 1992"] This kind of response typifies the majority on this and most other forums. You read a post and blindly miss pertinent details. I outlined three grounds which impel most posters to offer their thoughts. I've seen some of the most ridiculous claims concerning Boyd on this forum and it got me pondering on the thinking(if any!) underpinning the posts. Jealousy was just one. I also noted Glenns reliability. How did you miss that? A contrary view is not by necessity incorrect. Just because I have a view that doesn't align with the majority doesn't make me wrong and I'll readily change my position if presented with sufficient and sound reasoning. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 258 (members: 0, guests: 258)