Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sproj, post: 3071909, member: 8423"] It’s hard to absolve Siebold of responsibility. He was bought in to make changes one would imagine and he hasn’t made many of the hard ones. Roberts and Su’A were fairly straight forward. KNik was forced and in hindsight, not the smartest move if he was planning to move Milf to FB. KNik would have been a FAR better half than either Boyd or Turps. The answer at hooker just re-signed but can’t get a game there. There is a half available who has also looked ok who keeps getting shunted for two guys who have looked far from ok even in the halves for the most part. There are several very underperforming older heads who seem to be unaccountable and a few young kids who seem to be screaming out for a shot in a dysfunctional back line but can’t get a decent shot over a number of other blokes who are struggling. It is really hard to see any structure and any time there does seem to be progress, the side regresses alarmingly the very next game and it makes one wonder where the previous week came from. It is hard to see many positives in terms of what you would expect to be a result of coaching. Some of the kids do seem to be progressing but is it because of the coach or in spite of him? I’ve never wavered on giving the guy two seasons and can see excuses for the season for sure but next year changes need to be evident. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)