Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WASSHHH, post: 2992032, member: 9424"] I understand what you’re saying and you’re right, that’s how the law and a jury of your peers is required to operate. But we all know it’s never that black and white. There is so much grey sometimes. Without conclusive evidence either way, I don’t think it’s ridiculous to imagine that Cronulla would have recruited or retained at least a couple of players that they may not have were Flanagan not to have undertaken, seeing he started emailing just weeks after his suspension started it’s be pretty reasonable to say, 9 months of recruitment and retention work during his 12 month suspension. A team consisting of players recruited or retained by a suspended coach who wins a premiership. Remember, they’d already been punished for their misdemeanours and were flaunting such punishment. Unless the NRL grows a backbone and comes down hard, they’ll just continue to flaunt the rules and / or punishments. As you say, they can’t act on any of that without evidence. But if the NRL is serious, they should be working really hard to find a way to prove it, because there’s a better than solid chance it’s true. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 59 (members: 0, guests: 59)