Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Art Vandelay, post: 2796071, member: 8304"] I'm probably going to regret disagreeing with someone who knows far more than me but our loss in form happened independently of McCullough's absence. Yes we only won 2 out of 5 (40%) with him missing, but between rounds 9 and 21 we only won 27% of our games total. Our record in this period with McCullough playing was 1 from 6 (17%). I'm not saying he's not a better hooker than Waddell, McGuire or Nikorima, but his absence didn't cause us to suck. We were already there. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 303 (members: 0, guests: 303)