Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Tunza's Chin, post: 2796415, member: 8986"] Not against the Macca re-signing at all, defence speaks for itself. Service isn't bad. Be nice if he kicked more, but we've been saying that for years and it doesn't look like changing. If we assume the money we budget in the salary cap for spine players is an approximately fixed amount, I'd much rather sign Macca for relatively little then try and go out and buy one of the few hookers definitely better then him. That way we can spend more on a halfback/re-signing Milf. Also, as I've mentioned previously, when there's an attack opportunity - quick play the ball, retreating defence, etc - I want the ball in Milf or Boyds hands, not a hooker who is going to go himself. That being said, I think a two year deal would be ideal. I don't want to buy an established hooker that's better than him, but wouldn't be against Parcel coming back and forcing Macca out of the 9, or Kodi deciding his best position is hooker and improving his defence out of site. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 74 (members: 0, guests: 74)