Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Shoulder Charges in the Judiciary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="KingWebcke, post: 2525197, member: 8372"] those are flawed analogies in my opinion. Consequences will always play a part but the fact is that common law does try to account quite significantly for the intent and the seriousness of the action rather than focussing heavily on the consequences. that is the reason why manslaughter exists in addition to murder and why there are different gradations for most crimes, often based on the level of intent, planning and malice. your comparisons to common law are also based on the assumption that that system is entirely fair and equitable, which isn't something most people would subscribe to. I don't necessarily want the NRL judiciary following the philosophy and procedures of common law. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Shoulder Charges in the Judiciary
Top