Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Shoulder Charges in the Judiciary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="KingWebcke, post: 2525203, member: 8372"] Ultimately, the aim of a ban on shoulder charges is to improve player safety and the best way to do that is to discourage shoulder charges. I think the best way to discourage shoulder charges is to actually target the players who are still running around looking to drill players. That means guys like Fritchard and SBW, rather than Snowden. You're just sending an inconsistent message if Snowden gets slapped with a huge ban for a rather unfortunate series of events while Pritchard gets far less because (through sheer dumb luck) he didn't injure his opponent more seriously, despite the fact that he is clearly a player who hasn't heeded the new message. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Shoulder Charges in the Judiciary
Top